JUST HOW LANGUAGE PRESENTS THE WORLD IN BLITAR, EAST JAVA
Inside the SFL accounts the ideational strand of meaning the truth is involves two components: that of experiential which means in the offer (Halliday and Matthiessen 2004) and that from the logical that means between condition in offer complexes. Experiential meaning is definitely expressed through the system of Transitivity or process type, together with the choice of process implicating linked participant tasks and constructions.
Blitar can be described as city in East Java, lies between Malang that language can be assumed to be direct and earnest and Tulungagung in which people speak cautiously based on the degree of politenes. The language each uses is in common with other Austronesian languages, and spoken differently depending to the social framework.
Like various other languages, the centre of Blitarese clausal system is the verbal group construing the process and interacts through a variety of participant functions.
In Blitarese, process and participant can be presented as the following: a. Expressing what one knows about what does to whom under what circumstances: Individual Agus Kucinge Participant Kucinge Danang Participant Lik Pri Asune Individual Ibu Process ipant dolan. caring. Method ipant nggondhol nemu Process ipant tindak mlayu Procedure ipant tumbas Participant iwak duit Circumstances Participant nang Malang nang ratan Player pisang Circumstances Participant nang pasar
b. Yet , to bring someone's focus, one may say the process prior to participant. The word/phrase spoken before the previous participant is the central part of the term: Process Player ipant Dolan Caring Agus kucinge
Method ipant Tindak Mlayu
Situation nang Malang nang ratan
Participant Lik Pri asune
Process ipant Nggondhol Nemu Process ipant Tumbas
Participator iwak duit Participant pisang
Participant kucinge Danang Scenario Participant nang pasar Participant Ibu
c. Finite can be not applied in most Javanese language. Sometimes, the process is represented with a circumstance which is often expressed alternately with the emphasis on the 1st phrase: Individual ipant Wayange Pancine Mbukake Process ipant Circumstance engko bengi ning pogo karo gaman = = sama dengan Engko bengi Ning pogo Karo gaman wayange pancine mbukake
П† П† П†
CLAUSE CONSTITUENCY Most Blitarese clauses have constituent framework in terms of Individuals, Process and Circumstance. The following clauses are normal in this language. Circumstance
Participant ipant Lik Nur Lik Nur Lik Nur Lik Nur Lik Nur Lik Nur
Procedure ipant wis rawuh. ngasto ngasto slametan
Participant ipant oleh dengan. oleh oleh
П† П† П†
macem-macem. wingenane. teko Jakarta. lemu.
Individual ipant Bapak Bapak Bapak
Circumstance mambengi nang ngarep nang ngarep
Process ipant kenduren
Individual ipant nang daleme Sobre Kar. karo De Kar. П† manuk. Circumstance
Expected Clause likewise applies in Blitarese. Participator Aku Bu Guru Method lali ngutus Participant Forecasted clause nggowo payung. njupuk kapur.
PROCESS TYPES AND PLAYER ROLES Material Processes ( kenduren, jagongan, rawuh, etc) and Behavioral Processes (angop, watuk, krungu, ngampleng etc) as doing-verb can be seen in this kind of language. The mental procedures as projecting verbs are also applicable (lali, eling, rumongso).
a. вЂTak' and вЂmbok' Some mental and material processes will be uniquely preceeded by certain form of participator representing the first and second audio. Instead of using вЂaku', вЂtak' represents the behaver or senser, and in turn of вЂawakmu' or вЂsampeyan', вЂmbok' symbolizes the behaver or senser. These are used with specific behavioral or mental processes. Portion: Behaver Ngakl Mbok Portion: Senser Ngakl Mbok Pro: Material sawang sawang lebokno Pro: Mental kiro kiro Range Pheno awakmu Scenario Phenomenonarticip tambah ayu nang lemari
Sensation articipant awakmu loro. aku lali.
Referrals: Eggins, Suzanne, 2004. An intro to Systemic Functional Linguistics, Continuum Intercontinental Publishing Group. London. Halliday, MAK & Mathiessen, MIM, 2004 An Introduction to Useful Grammar. Oxford University Press, New York.